Various studies published recently about the relationship between low-dose radiation and cancer fanned again the discussion about the risks and benefits of modern diagnostic techniques and in particular Computer Tomography (CT).
For many years the relationship between cancer development and radiation exposure has been studied, and there are hundreds if not thousands of publications related to this topic. You can get more information about medical centers in the medical center online at https://epfamilyclinic.com.au/.
The problem is that a third of all people get cancer anyway, at some point in their lives, and because it was quite difficult to find evidence that low doses of radiation cause cancer which would not otherwise occur.
Even for 80,000 to 90,000 people who survived the atomic bomb explosion over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, exposed to very large doses of radiation, it has been difficult to find a direct relationship between excess cancer development and radiation exposure.
Image Source: Google
This model assumes that there is no safe dose of radiation and that there is a linear and direct relationship between the risk of cancer and genetic damage to radiation exposure. But this model has been in discussions for a long time.
For some scientists, a linear model is the best way to estimate the risk of radiation, but for others, there is a threshold below which radiation poses no hazard to health. It is not difficult to identify the sources of the most important of man-made or anthropogenic radiation.
Most of the collective dose from diagnostic radiology is derived from procedures like CT, interventional radiology, and barium enema. Radiological diagnostic technology advances have radically changed medical practice in recent years and there has been a rapid increase especially in the application of CT.